AI Development Intelligence Platform

THE MEMORY
YOUR CODE
DESERVES

Git stores what changed. Jira stores what was planned. SWAPCORE stores why every decision was made — permanently, causally linked, queryable in 3 seconds.

Scroll
47B
DevOps TAM
3s
Context query
0
Workflow changes
40+
Integrations
The problem

WHY DID WE
BUILD IT
THIS WAY?

The engineer who knows the answer left 6 months ago. The Slack thread is buried. The ADR was never written. Every AI coding tool starts from zero every session.

SWAPCORE is the layer that sits between all your existing tools and permanently captures the reasoning behind every decision, commit, risk, and deployment — automatically.

What exists today
Git — stores WHAT changed
Perfect code history. Zero history of why any of it was written that way.
What exists today
AI tools — session-bound
Brilliant within one session. Complete amnesia the moment it closes.
VS
What SWAPCORE adds
SWAPCORE — stores WHY forever
Every decision, rejected alternative, and deferred risk — permanently stored, causally linked, queryable in 3 seconds by anyone.

Architecture deep-dive

THE MEMORY
LAYER

Four layers working in concert. Every event from every tool flows down through normalisation, enrichment, and storage — then back up as precision-assembled context for the Architect Agent.

L1
Adapter layer
GitHub webhook GitLab webhook Jira webhook Jenkins hook GitHub Actions Slack events Azure DevOps Polling workers CLI manual entry MCP server Every tool's raw payload normalised into a single CanonicalEvent. The raw field is never modified — replay safety.
↓ Kafka event bus — 6 topics — 30-day replay window ↓
L2
Intent engine
IntentInferrer LiteLLM router Claude / GPT-4 Embedding gen Auto-linker Causal chain builder AI extracts why_text from commit message + PR + linked ticket. Confidence scored HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW. Causal links built between related records.
↓ Enriched CanonicalEvent → MemoryRecord write ↓
L3
Memory store
Redis hot cache PostgreSQL episodic pgvector semantic GIN full-text index HNSW vector index Causal graph Three-tier memory. Redis for 24h hot context. PostgreSQL for permanent episodic storage with mandatory why_text NOT NULL. pgvector for 1536-dim semantic search.
↑ Context Stitcher — parallel search — scored + ranked ↑
L4
Intelligence
Architect Agent Context Stitcher Why queries Causal debug Onboarding brief Risk summary Sprint summary LangGraph CLI + Web UI MCP tools Top-8 ranked records assembled into a ContextBrief. Injected as system prompt prefix. Every agent action writes its own AGENT_ACTION MemoryRecord — the system accumulates memory of its own reasoning.
memory_typeDECISION
what_textReplaced Braintree with Stripe as primary payment processor
why_textBraintree had no idempotency key support on retries — double-charging customers on network failures. Stripe idempotency keys make retries provably safe. This was the core migration reason. ALL retry logic added here MUST use idempotency keys.
confidenceHIGH
linked_ids[risk-flag-r3, incident-PAY-287, commit-a4f8c2d]
tags[payments, idempotency, stripe, migration, critical]

Product roadmap

THREE STAGES TO
FULL AUTONOMOUS
DELIVERY

SWAPCORE earns trust incrementally. Stage 1 only observes. Stage 2 acts with approval. Stage 3 operates end-to-end. Each stage is a complete product — not a beta.

Stage 1 Months 0–6 · 9 prompts · Observe only

MEMORY LAYER
+ ARCHITECT AGENT

The foundation. Passive capture of every commit, ticket, build, and decision from 8+ tools. Permanent memory with mandatory why_text. The Architect Agent answers any question about your codebase history in plain English — with source citations. Zero external writes. Zero workflow change.

Passive capture
Webhooks on GitHub, Jira, Jenkins, Slack, Azure DevOps. Git hooks for every commit. No manual effort.
Intent inference
AI extracts why_text from commit messages, PR descriptions, linked tickets. Confidence scored automatically.
Causal chains
Auto-linker builds causal relationships between decisions, commits, risk flags, and incidents over time.
Architect Agent
5 query types: why query, risk summary, causal debug, onboarding brief, sprint summary. All with source citations.
CLI + Dashboard
swapcore ask, record, debug, onboard, risks — full Rich terminal output. Web dashboard with live SSE updates.
MCP for Cursor
One config file. Cursor fetches SWAPCORE memory automatically before every architecture answer.
Stage 1 principleSWAPCORE never writes to any external tool in Stage 1. It only observes and answers. This is deliberate — trust is built before autonomy is granted. Enterprise customers must see the memory working before they will accept agents acting on it.
Stage 2 Months 7–18 · 4 prompts · Human-approved writes

PM AGENT
+ DEV AGENT

The first agents that write to external tools. The PM Agent decomposes natural language requirements into Jira or Azure DevOps tickets. The Dev Agent takes a ticket and produces a pull request. Every external write goes through an unbypassable ApprovalGate — there is no code path that skips it.

PM Agent
Requirement → stories → Jira/ADO tickets. Fetches memory context before decomposing. Draft mode for review before writing.
Dev Agent
Ticket → implementation plan → approval → branch → code → tests → PR. Hard limits: no force-push, no secrets files, no protected branches.
ApprovalGate
Every write requires explicit human approval. 24-hour timeout. Rejection recorded to memory. Unbypassable in LangGraph state machine.
Memory-informed code
Dev Agent fetches full project memory before writing a single line. Cannot suggest a pattern the team explicitly rejected.
Multi-tool write support
Jira Cloud, Jira Server, Azure DevOps. Adapter pattern — swapping tools is a config change, not a rewrite.
Ephemeral code handling
Dev Agent clones to an ephemeral volume. Volume wiped after PR creation. No customer source code ever stored in SWAPCORE.
Stage 2 principleHuman approval is not a feature — it is a hard architectural constraint enforced in the LangGraph state machine. There is no --skip-approval flag, no environment variable bypass, no emergency override. Approval gates exist because enterprise trust is earned action by action.
Stage 3 Months 19–36 · 4 prompts · Full autonomous pipeline

DEVOPS + SECURITY
+ QA AGENTS
+ MARKETPLACE

The complete autonomous delivery platform. PR merge triggers the full pipeline: Security Agent scans, QA Agent validates, DevOps Agent deploys with auto-rollback. The integration marketplace lets third-party developers extend the tool universe. SWAPCORE becomes infrastructure.

DevOps Agent
PR merge → pipeline trigger → deploy (blue/green, canary, rolling) → monitor → auto-rollback at 1% error rate. All cloud providers supported.
Security Agent
SAST (Bandit, Semgrep, ESLint), DAST (OWASP ZAP), secret scanning (truffleHog), CVE audit. CRITICAL findings block pipeline — no override.
QA Agent
Test plan generation from memory + acceptance criteria. Regression analysis. Flakiness detection cross-referenced against memory. Coverage gating.
Multi-tenant hardening
ORM-level namespace isolation. Per-org AES-256-GCM encryption. Immutable audit log. RBAC. Data residency routing. SOC2 / ISO27001 exports.
Cloud-agnostic deploy
Provider adapters: AWS ECS, AWS EKS, GCP Cloud Run, GCP GKE, Azure AKS, on-prem kubectl. Terraform change gating with approval.
Integration marketplace
Adapter SDK for third-party developers. Verified badge. Hot-load without restart. Paid adapters with 70/30 revenue split. swapcore adapter install.
Stage 3 principleSWAPCORE becomes a platform, not a product. The integration marketplace is what makes it defensible at scale — third-party developers extend the tool universe far beyond what our team can build. After 90 days of memory, the switching cost for any customer becomes insurmountable. The data moat is the moat.

Integration ecosystem

40+ INTEGRATIONS
ACROSS EVERY
TOOL YOU USE

SWAPCORE connects to your existing stack via webhooks, polling workers, SDK embed, MCP server, and REST API. No tool lock-in. Every integration is swappable at the adapter boundary.

Source control (SCM)
GitHub
GitLab
Bitbucket
Azure Repos
Gitea
Gitea on-prem
Project management
Jira Cloud
Azure DevOps
Linear
Jira Server
Asana
Monday.com
Shortcut
Trello
ClickUp
Notion
CI / CD pipelines
GitHub Actions
Jenkins
GitLab CI
CircleCI
ArgoCD
TeamCity
Bamboo
Buildkite
Travis CI
Drone CI
Observability & incidents
PagerDuty
Datadog
Grafana
Sentry
New Relic
Prometheus
Opsgenie
VictorOps
Rollbar
Messaging & communication
Slack
Microsoft Teams
Discord
Google Chat
Cloud infrastructure
AWS CloudTrail
AWS ECS / EKS
GCP Cloud Run
GCP GKE
Azure AKS
Azure Monitor
Terraform Cloud
Pulumi
On-prem Kubernetes
AI / IDE tools (MCP)
Cursor
Claude (Anthropic)
Windsurf
Continue.dev
VS Code extension
JetBrains plugin
Zed
Neovim plugin
Knowledge & documentation
Confluence
Notion
Google Drive
SharePoint
Backstage
Readme.io
ITSM & enterprise
ServiceNow
Freshservice
Zendesk
BMC Remedy
Ivanti
Security scanning
Snyk
SonarQube
Semgrep
Checkov
OWASP ZAP
truffleHog
Bandit
npm audit
HIGHLIGHTED = Stage 1 launch integrations All others available via Adapter SDK or Stage 2/3 marketplace

End-to-end flow

FROM IDEA
TO DEPLOYMENT
WITH SWAPCORE

Every stage of the software delivery lifecycle — from a developer's first question to a production deployment — flows through SWAPCORE's memory layer. Agents act at each stage, informed by permanent institutional memory.

Developer zone — Idea · Requirements · Code · Review
Input
Developer / Product Owner
Natural language requirement, feature idea, or bug report. Enters SWAPCORE via CLI, web UI, or Cursor chat.
IDE integration
Cursor / Claude (MCP)
AI calls swapcore_get_context() before answering. Full project memory injected as system prompt prefix — invisibly, in 200ms.
Stage 2 · PM Agent
Requirement → Tickets
Decomposes requirement into Jira / Azure DevOps stories. Fetches memory for similar past work. ApprovalGate before any write.
Output
Jira / Azure DevOps
Stories with acceptance criteria, story points, epic links — all cross-referenced against 6 weeks of team decisions.
Stage 2 · Dev Agent
Ticket → Pull Request
Reads memory context, generates implementation plan, requests approval, clones repo, implements, runs tests, creates PR with memory citations.
Output
GitHub / GitLab PR
Branch created, tests passing, PR description includes architectural decisions consulted and risk flags checked.
SWAPCORE MEMORY CORE
Kafka event bus · PostgreSQL + pgvector · Redis · Context Stitcher · Architect Agent
Every event captured → why_text inferred → causal links built → context assembled → agents informed
Agent zone — All agents running in parallel, informed by memory
01
Stage 1
Architect Agent
Answers questions about codebase history, decisions, risks, and onboarding in plain English. 5 query types.
02
Stage 2
PM Agent
Decomposes requirements into tickets with full memory context. Jira + Azure DevOps. Approval-gated.
03
Stage 2
Dev Agent
Ticket to PR with memory-informed code. Hard limits enforced. Two approval gates before any push.
04
Stage 3
Security Agent
SAST, DAST, CVE scan, secret detection. CRITICAL findings block pipeline — no override possible.
05
Stage 3
QA Agent
Test plan generation, execution, regression analysis, flakiness detection against memory history.
06
Stage 3
DevOps Agent
PR merge → pipeline trigger → deploy (blue/green, canary, rolling) → monitor → auto-rollback at 1% error rate. All cloud providers.
Delivery zone — Build · Test · Scan · Deploy · Monitor
Stage 3 · Security Agent
SAST + DAST + CVE scan
Bandit, Semgrep, ESLint security, OWASP ZAP, truffleHog, npm audit. Findings written as MemoryRecords with PR link.
Stage 3 · QA Agent
Test generation + execution
Generates missing tests from acceptance criteria + memory. Runs suite. Regression analysis. Coverage gate at 80%.
Stage 3 · DevOps Agent
Deploy strategy selection
Fetches deployment history from memory. Selects blue/green, canary, or rolling based on service risk profile. Terraform changes gated.
Stage 3 · DevOps Agent
Execute + Monitor
Triggers CI/CD pipeline. Monitors error rate + latency 10 min post-deploy. Auto-rollback at 1% error rate. Outcome written to memory.
Target
Production environment
AWS ECS / EKS · GCP Cloud Run / GKE · Azure AKS · On-prem Kubernetes. All cloud-agnostic via provider adapters.
Feedback loop
Memory updated forever
DEPLOYMENT MemoryRecord written: strategy, outcome, rollback reason. Every future deploy is informed by all past deploys.
Legend: Stage 1 — Observe only Stage 2 — Human-approved writes Stage 3 — Full autonomous pipeline External tool output Infrastructure / cloud

Real-world vibe coding

BUILDING AN
AI WRITING
ASSISTANT SaaS

Watch how SWAPCORE gives a solo developer using Cursor + Claude API persistent memory across 5 weeks of vibe coding sessions. No re-explaining the stack. No forgotten decisions. No duplicate bugs.

The app being built
Scribe — AI writing assistant
A SaaS product that uses the Claude API to help users draft, refine, and improve long-form content. Multi-tenant, subscription billing via Stripe, real-time streaming responses, usage metering per org. Built solo by one developer over 5 weeks using Cursor + Claude.
Next.js 14 Claude claude-sonnet-4-5 Supabase Stripe Tailwind Vercel SWAPCORE

Without SWAPCORE, every session starts with re-explaining the stack, re-justifying past decisions, and risking contradictions across sessions.

With SWAPCORE, the developer records 2–3 decisions per session. Cursor fetches the full memory brief automatically. By week 4, the AI is generating code that is consistent with every architectural choice made in week 1.

SWAPCORE session discipline
Start session → ask Cursor "what have we built and why?" → build → record 2–3 decisions → commit. Takes 90 extra seconds. Compounds for months.
W1
Project setup — Claude API, auth, database schema
Session 1 · Monday
Dev
I am building a SaaS writing assistant using the Claude API. Starting fresh. What is the best auth + database setup for a multi-tenant app on Next.js 14?
Cursor AI
Without SWAPCORE: Generic answer about Next-Auth, Prisma, PlanetScale options. No project context. Developer picks randomly and may contradict later decisions.

→ Developer builds: Supabase auth + Supabase PostgreSQL, NextAuth.js, org-scoped RLS policies. Records decisions:

DECISION · confidence: HIGH What: Using Supabase for auth + database. NextAuth.js with Supabase adapter. Why: Supabase handles RLS natively — org-scoped data isolation without application-layer code. Clerk rejected at $25/month for 1000 users. PlanetScale rejected — no RLS, would need custom isolation middleware for every query.
DECISION · confidence: HIGH What: Multi-tenant isolation via Supabase RLS policies on every table. Why: RLS enforced at database level means even a buggy API route cannot leak cross-org data. Took 4 hours to get right — the policy must use auth.uid() IN (SELECT user_id FROM org_members WHERE org_id = rows.org_id). Document this pattern for every future table.
2 decisions recorded initial commit
W2
Claude API streaming — token metering + rate limiting
Session 2 · Thursday
Dev
I want to add Claude API streaming to the editor. Users should see the text appear in real time. Also need to meter token usage per org for billing.
SWAPCORE
Fetching context brief for "Claude API streaming token metering"... Found 2 relevant records from Week 1. Supabase RLS pattern (org isolation), NextAuth session structure. Injecting into Cursor system prompt.
Cursor AI
Given your Supabase RLS setup, here is the streaming implementation. Important: the token counter must write to a usage_events table with the same RLS pattern you established in Week 1 — auth.uid() IN (SELECT user_id FROM org_members...). Otherwise a billing query could leak cross-org usage data. Use anthropic.messages.stream() with Server-Sent Events on the Next.js API route...

→ Cursor referenced Week 1 RLS pattern automatically. Saved 2 hours of debugging a cross-org data leak. Developer records:

DECISION · confidence: HIGH What: Streaming Claude responses via SSE on /api/generate route. Token counting in Supabase usage_events table. Why: Using anthropic.messages.stream() with ReadableStream piped to SSE. Token metering happens server-side in the stream onFinalMessage callback — never trust client-reported token counts for billing. usage_events table uses same RLS policy as all other tables per Week 1 isolation pattern.
RISK_FLAG · deferred What: No rate limiting on /api/generate. A single user could exhaust the org token budget in minutes. Deferred because: Shipping MVP for first 3 beta users who are known. Must add Upstash Redis rate limiting before public launch. Risk: org cost overrun if any user runs automated scripts against the endpoint.
1 decision recorded 1 risk flagged feat: claude streaming + usage metering
W3
Stripe billing — subscription plans + webhook handler
Session 3 · Tuesday
Dev
Add Stripe subscription billing. Two plans: Starter ($29/mo, 50k tokens) and Pro ($99/mo, 500k tokens). Need webhook to update the subscription status in the database.
SWAPCORE
Context brief assembled. 3 records relevant: Supabase RLS pattern · SSE streaming architecture · open risk flag about rate limiting (week 2). Injecting into Cursor.
Cursor AI
Stripe webhook handler for this project. Critical: the webhook must update the org_subscriptions table using the Supabase service role key, not the anon key — because RLS will block it. You established RLS on all tables in Week 1. The webhook runs as a server process outside the user session, so it has no auth.uid() context. Service role bypasses RLS deliberately here. Also — this is a good time to add the Upstash rate limiting you flagged as a risk in Week 2...

→ Cursor surfaced the RLS + service role issue AND the open risk flag from Week 2 without being asked. Both would have caused production bugs.

DECISION · confidence: HIGH What: Stripe webhooks use Supabase service_role key to update org_subscriptions. Rate limiting added via Upstash Redis (closes risk flag from Week 2). Why: Webhook has no user session → no auth.uid() → RLS blocks anon key writes. Service role is the only correct pattern here. Rate limit: 20 requests per user per minute using sliding window in Upstash. Closes the risk flag about cost overrun from unmetered usage.
1 decision recorded risk flag closed feat: stripe billing + rate limiting
W4
System prompts — user-customisable AI personas
Session 4 · Wednesday
Dev
I want users to be able to create and save custom system prompts — like "write in a formal legal tone" or "respond as a startup founder". Store them per org, reuse across sessions.
Cursor AI
For the system_prompts table — apply the same RLS policy you established in Week 1: auth.uid() IN (SELECT user_id FROM org_members WHERE org_id = system_prompts.org_id). You have now used this pattern on 4 tables (users, usage_events, org_subscriptions, system_prompts). Worth extracting it into a reusable Supabase policy template so new tables get it automatically. Also — system prompts are injected before the user message, so they count against the token budget. The usage_events counter from Week 2 needs to include system prompt tokens in its calculation...

→ Cursor noticed the RLS pattern applied 4 times and suggested a template. It also caught the token counting gap — system prompt tokens were being excluded from billing, which would have caused revenue leakage at scale.

DECISION · confidence: HIGH What: Extracted RLS pattern into reusable Supabase policy function. System prompt tokens included in usage_events count. Why: After applying the same RLS boilerplate to 4 tables, abstracted into create_org_rls_policy(table_name) function. Prevents future tables from being accidentally unprotected. Token count now uses input_tokens from the Anthropic API response which includes system prompt length — fixes billing undercount that would cost ~12% revenue at scale.
1 decision recorded feat: system prompts + rls refactor
W5
New developer joins — onboards in 20 minutes
Session 5 · Monday
New dev (Rahul)
I have just joined the Scribe project. Can you give me a full overview of the architecture, key decisions, and anything I should know before I start adding the document export feature?
SWAPCORE
Running onboarding brief for project "scribe" across all 28 MemoryRecords... assembled in 210ms.
Cursor AI
Scribe — Architecture brief for Rahul:

Stack: Next.js 14, Supabase (auth + PostgreSQL), Claude claude-sonnet-4-5 API, Stripe, Vercel.

Most important pattern — RLS isolation: Every table uses an identical RLS policy via the create_org_rls_policy() function (added Week 4). Any new table you create must call this. If you skip it, org data becomes visible cross-tenant.

Claude API: Streaming via SSE on /api/generate. Token counting uses input_tokens + output_tokens from the final message response — includes system prompt tokens. Rate limited at 20 req/min per user via Upstash Redis.

Stripe webhooks: Must use service_role key, not anon key — RLS blocks anon writes from server processes with no user session.

For document export: PDF generation should use the service_role key for the same reason. Store exports in Supabase Storage with the org_id as the bucket path prefix for isolation.

→ Rahul had full project context in 20 minutes. Every architectural decision from 5 weeks, the RLS pattern, the token counting fix, the service role rule — all surfaced automatically. Zero documentation was ever written.

28 records · 5 weeks · onboarding in 20 min
What SWAPCORE captured across 5 weeks of vibe coding Scribe
28
Memory records
8
Decisions saved
3
Bugs prevented
20min
New dev onboarding

MCP
Cursor + SWAPCORE

ONE CONFIG
FILE. THAT'S IT.

SWAPCORE connects to Cursor, Claude, Windsurf, and any MCP-compatible AI tool via the Model Context Protocol. The AI fetches project memory automatically before every answer — without any developer action.

~/.cursor/mcp.json
// One-time setup. Works forever after this.
{
  "mcpServers": {
    "swapcore": {
      "command": "swapcore-mcp",
      "args": ["--project", "payments-api"],
      "env": {
        "SWAPCORE_API_KEY": "sk-swapcore-..."
      }
    }
  }
}
Terminal
# Install MCP server (once)
npm install -g @swapcore/mcp

# Initialise project (once per repo)
swapcore init \
  --project payments-api \
  --github-repo org/repo

# Done. Cursor now has full project memory.

The SWAPCORE MCP server exposes 5 tools that Cursor's AI calls automatically. When you ask an architecture question, Cursor calls swapcore_get_context() before generating its response — invisibly, in under 200ms.

get_context()
Fetch relevant memory for any question. Returns top-8 MemoryRecords ranked by keyword + semantic score.
record_decision()
Save a decision with what + why + tags. Called at end of session to preserve reasoning for future developers.
record_risk()
Flag a known gap or shortcut with deferred_because rationale. Surfaces in risk dashboard and future context.
get_open_risks()
List all unresolved risk flags for the project. Called before starting new features to surface known issues.
debug()
Trace a bug backward through commits, decisions, and risk flags. Returns full causal chain with confidence.

Competitive landscape

NOBODY ELSE
OWNS THIS LAYER

Every competitor is locked to one tool, one session, or one slice. SWAPCORE owns the tool-agnostic institutional memory layer across the full SDLC.

Capability SWAPCORE GitHub Copilot Atlassian AI Devin / SWE Datadog Linear AI
Cross-session memory✓ Always— Never◑ Jira only— Never— Never— Never
Why decisions stored✓ Core feature— None— None— None— None— None
Tool-agnostic✓ By design◑ GitHub only◑ Atlassian◑ Limited◑ Observ.◑ PM only
Causal debug chain✓ Full trace— None— None— None◑ Metrics— None
Onboarding brief✓ Automatic— None— None— None— None— None
Full SDLC coverage✓ All stages◑ Code only◑ PM + code◑ Code only◑ Ops only◑ PM only
On-prem enterprise✓ Helm + k8s— Cloud◑ Server— Cloud✓ Yes— Cloud
Data moat compounds✓ Daily— Session— None— None— None— None
Autonomous agents✓ Stage 2+◑ Code gen◑ Limited✓ Code— None◑ PM only

Pricing

SIMPLE.
SCALABLE.
ANNUAL.

Priced on team size — not per seat. The value of institutional memory is organisational.

Team
$2K/mo
Up to 20 engineers · Billed annually
  • GitHub + Jira + Jenkins adapters
  • Architect Agent — 5 query types
  • CLI + web dashboard
  • Unlimited memory storage
  • MCP for Cursor / Claude
  • Email support
Get started
Most popular
Growth
$5K/mo
Up to 100 engineers · Billed annually
  • All 20+ tool integrations
  • Unlimited dashboard seats
  • SSO via Keycloak
  • Stage 2 agents — early access
  • Slack integration included
  • Priority support + SLA
Request early access
Enterprise
Custom
500+ engineers · On-prem available
  • On-prem Kubernetes + Helm
  • Custom adapters + marketplace
  • SOC2 / ISO27001 audit exports
  • Per-org encryption (Vault/KMS)
  • Active Directory / Okta SSO
  • Dedicated support engineer
Contact sales

The founders

BUILT BY
ENGINEERS
WHO FELT
THE PAIN

Three founders. Combined decades watching institutional knowledge walk out the door every time a senior engineer resigned.

SS
Chief Executive Officer
Shashank Sonawane
Shashank leads SWAPCORE's vision, strategy, and go-to-market. He brings deep experience building and scaling B2B developer tools, with a sharp focus on solving the institutional knowledge problem that costs engineering teams weeks of lost productivity every year.
CEO · Product vision · GTM strategy
GA
Chief Technology Officer
Gaurav Ashtikar
Gaurav architects SWAPCORE's core platform — the four-layer memory system, the Architect Agent, the MCP integration layer, and the autonomous agent pipeline. He designed the tool-agnostic adapter architecture that lets SWAPCORE connect to any development tool without changing how engineers work.
CTO · Platform architecture · AI systems
KS
Chief Financial Officer
Kishor Shelke
Kishor manages SWAPCORE's financial strategy, investor relations, and operational scaling. He ensures the business is built to last — from early customer revenue through enterprise contracts, with the discipline that turns a great product into a great company.
CFO · Finance · Operations · Investor relations

STOP LOSING
YOUR WHY

The first team to deploy SWAPCORE builds a compounding memory advantage. Every week without it is a week of context lost forever.

Request early access Talk to the team →